0:00
/

Trump Attacks His Own Prosecutor After Her Office Admits Reflecting Pool Installation Was Botched

Jeanine Pirro spent a month insisting an Olympic canoeist destroyed the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. On Friday, her office said in court it was a faulty installation, then Trump turned on her.

President Donald Trump publicly attacked his own U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia on Saturday morning, hours after her office admitted in a court filing that the damage to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool was caused by the administration’s own rushed renovation and not by a vandal.

“I disagree 100% with Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, on the Reflecting Pool,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “I don’t know what she was thinking?”

The post capped a six-week collapse of one of the administration’s loudest law-and-order stories, and it exposed something the White House has spent all summer trying to avoid admitting: the renovation Trump ordered, paid for with millions in public money, failed on its own.

How it started

Trump announced the project in April as part of a broader effort to spruce up the National Mall before the country’s 250th birthday. He wanted the bottom of the pool resurfaced in a shade he called American flag blue, and he told reporters the work would take about a week and cost roughly $1.8 million.

The actual contracts told a different story. Federal procurement records showed the government committed more than $14 million to the effort, including a contract to Virginia-based Atlantic Industrial Coatings to repaint and waterproof the pool floor. The work was awarded without competitive bidding on the grounds that it needed to be done immediately and that the company is led by a Trump donor.

Trump declared the project finished in early June. Within days, the water turned green with algae and sheets of the new blue coating began peeling off the bottom and floating in the pool.

How the blame shifted

Rather than acknowledge a failed installation, the administration reached for sabotage.

Trump told reporters in June that people had been caught damaging the pool with a box cutter and had thrown fertilizer into the water. The White House condemned what it called targeted sabotage as repairs slipped past the July 4 celebration. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said the same contractor would handle the new round of repairs without seeking bids because, in his words, the company did a fantastic job.

At least seven people were arrested or cited in connection with alleged damage to the pool.

The highest profile target was David Hearn, a 67-year-old three-time Olympic canoeist from Bethesda, Maryland. Hearn stopped at the pool during a long bike ride on June 19. He says he reached into the water, touched a piece of coating that was already peeling, and let go when a park employee told him to stop.

Pirro’s office charged him with felony destruction of property. At a July 2 news conference announcing the indictment, she said prosecutors would prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Hearn willfully destroyed property, described him as forcefully and violently ripping up the liner, and noted he faced up to 10 years in prison. Asked whether she was charging harshly at the president’s direction, she said she charges according to the evidence.

Hearn pleaded not guilty on July 9 and was released on his own recognizance.

How it fell apart

Pirro’s own account of the reversal is remarkable.

According to her filing, she visited the drained pool herself on July 17 and became aware of significant damage across the entire basin, not just the small patch Hearn was accused of touching. Her office then demanded records from the Interior Department about how the pool had been lined, and received 695 megabytes of documents in return.

Those records described repeated lining failures during installation, extensive peeling throughout the pool, and a scramble to finish before the holiday. A National Park Service engineer had observed the new lining peeling within two days of the final inspection on June 11, attributing the damage to overspraying and delamination.

“The rush to complete the project led to hasty and botched work that was not remediated before the project was finished and the fencing removed,” Pirro wrote.

She was blunter still about who misled whom, writing that the damage resulted from a botched installation and not vandalism, as the Interior Department had initially represented. Her conclusion: given the newly discovered information, it is difficult to attribute the widespread damage to vandalism at all, let alone prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.

Hearn’s attorneys called the prosecution an abuse of government power and said the administration owes their client an apology.

How Trump responded

Not with an apology. With an attack on the prosecutor who blinked.

“To me, it was a pure case of VANDALISM, that included the grass, which had a big 86 47 emblazoned in giant letters on it, and other elements of the surrounding area,” Trump wrote in his Truth Social post.

Buried in the same paragraph was a concession he almost never makes. “There may have been some contractor difficulty,” Trump allowed, “but the major damage was caused by VANDALS!”

That is the whole story in one sentence. Faced with a filing from his own Justice Department that blames his own rushed project, the president gave up the smallest possible piece of ground and kept insisting on the version that lets him off the hook.

Three other people are still facing misdemeanor charges tied to the pool. Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon has been pressing for answers about the cost of a renovation that peeled apart within weeks. Hearn is due back in court on August 5.


This is what accountability journalism is for. The Trump administration spent millions on a failed project, then tried to pin the failure on a private citizen riding his bike past a national monument. It took a court filing to force the truth out. Follow Democratic Reporter and help us keep the pressure on.

Discussion about this video

User's avatar

Ready for more?